What do experts say about language choices?
2/6/2016
Well, we all know anyone can say anything and others think they are an expert based on the number of classes they have taken or the number of years of experience or whatever. Me? I have taken lots of classes, gotten lots of training and I may or may not be considered an expert – you can decide who you want to believe. And that is where statistics and published research can guide you, sway you, convince you, change your mind – whatever you want to call it. That AH HA! moment when you suddenly bring everything you know (or want to know) about something and suddenly – it all make sense in your mind.
I work in the field of early intervention. I study children and watch how they react to stimulus. I am NOT a researcher – I do not create studies or publish articles. I put obstacles in children’s paths to see what they will do. I encourage parents to do this as well because it makes kids make choices and solve problems!
A friend of mine shared a “paper” with me that was a commentary by no less than 7 PhD people. The title of this paper is called “Language Choices for Deaf Infants: Advice for Parents Regarding Sign Languages”. I do not have permission to share this with you ( I didn’t ask) but I will include their names at the bottom of this post if you want to get more info from them. If you need people with education telling you what is what – 7 PhDs should be adequate!
What does it mean? What kind of advice could be coming from PhD people? I will be paraphrasing and summarizing – some of the paper is jargon or info about how they came to their conclusions. The leading paragraph is about how medical professionals try to avoid biasing parents on how to raise their children and allow for people to have different cultures and ways of raising children. However, this is one area where things can get fairly confusing. For example, if your child only has 1 leg for whatever reason, the recommendation will likely be prosthesis – a mechanical leg to replace their leg. If your child cannot see well – glasses or corrective lenses are prescribed – no big deal, right? If you child has Cerebral Palsy – the recommendations may include special exercises to help with mobility – also ok, right? If a child cannot speak due to a physical and OBVIOUS ABNORMALITY – then it’s ok to use other communication strategies, right? Like Stephen Hawking using eye gaze to communicate with. If a child has Autism and doesn’t speak or is Non-verbal – then it’s ok if that kiddo signs (at least until they go to school where very likely – they will be denied an ASL interpreter because they can hear and despite the only communication method they use is ASL) {another blog} So, why are DEAF kids denied sign language when clearly – they cannot hear a spoken language. Why are parents ALLOWED to choose to not use sign language? In the interest in autonomy and “Parent Choice” – parents are allowed to try anything they want when it comes to this area. In other countries – it is a crime punishable by having your child removed from your custody if you do not learn to sign by the time the kid is a certain age. Not in America – we value parent choice in this arena. This paper SAYS doctors and medical professionals should persuade parents to learn and teach sign language – that is ETHICALLY MANDATORY (my emphasis – this is all my emphasis though J)
Many parents and medical professionals believe that Cochlear Implants (CI) give children the hearing they need in order to ONLY use oral language. These professionals OFTEN do not acknowledge the reality that CIs do not replace normal hearing. Cochlear Implants take sound and transform it into electrical impulses delivered directly to the cochlear nerve. The CI child needs to undergo LONG-TERM, EXTENSIVE training to interpret those impulses. Language acquisition is age zero to 5 years old. Realistically – when can a child have extensive long term training? Just think about a group of Pre-K children age 4 (well into their 5 year window of opportunity to acquire language) and you can see that having a group of them is nearly impossible to control much less extensively train. While kids with CIs are being pulled out of a classroom to be taught how to interpret electrical impulses – their peers are learning how to read and write. Not exactly a fair trade off – these kids are already behind!
According to this paper – the neuronal plasticity of the brain with respect to language acquisition is BEFORE age 3 and if a child is not fluent in ANY language before age 5 that child may not ever achieve fluency in ANY language. At the same time – there is an increase in the development of brain tissue for visual input.
Sign languages provide this visual input; access to signing can ensure language acquisition for Deaf children and avoid cognitive deficits associated with linguistic deprivation. A recent panel of specialists concluded that all children born deaf should be taught a sign language immediately.
The deaf child that signs does better academically than the deaf child that doesn’t sign. And some studies show that deaf children with Deaf parents often score higher academically than their hearing counterparts.
This team of 7 PhDs is a team that works with deaf children and wrote this paper to help pediatricians have answers for parents that they encounter with deaf children. Here are the questions they answered:
What will give my child the best chances of learning to talk?
The starting point is language acquisition which is not necessarily speech. Both spoken and signed languages are treated as equals in the brain. A child must understand the concept of language communication before they can use language to communicate. As a child engages in accessible language communication – they begin to use it themselves naturally. Signed languages are accessible to all deaf children or children with hearing loss – spoken language may only be accessible to children with hearing aids or cochlear implants. There is a huge amount of research proving that introducing two languages does not interfere with the acquisition of either. Just looking at the families I work with where the parents or grandparents only speak Spanish but the kiddo uses English appropriately demonstrates that the brain is perfectly capable of learning more than 1 language at a time.
Many studies show signing supports the development of spoken language and reading skills in CI children. Then they discussed how it seems to increase incrementally from just a CI and spoken language to CI children with Deaf parents out performing other groups regardless of hearing status presumably due to sign competence.
How can I teach my child signing if I don’t sign myself?
Even if the parent’s language skills aren’t perfect – the use of the language is important to the language development of the child. Children need to interact directly through language with their family members to develop healthy relationships with those members – otherwise the child ends up feel excluded and isolated in their own home – always an outsider. When a hearing mother signs with her deaf child, the child shows early language expressiveness on a par with hearing peers regardless of the mother’s signing skills.
Deaf children who have good family relationships have a better chance of developing healthy psychosocial identities.
When children are exposed to good sign language models – they learn to sign fluently even if their family does not.
Won’t there be less family disruption and less work if I raise my child strictly orally?
The presence of a deaf child changes family dynamics regardless of the language you use. Oral language requires a level of commitment on the part of the child to learn to communicate with spoken language. It requires a large amount of time and energy on the part of both parent and child. There are other consequences as well – if the child doesn’t have the ability to develop spoken language the time invested is wasted and that time cannot be replaced in the language acquisition limits and that child will most likely experience a sense of failure internally as a result of not learning to talk.
On the other hand, signed language allows for the child to develop cognitively and avoid family frustration. Sign language also allows the deaf child to participate in all communication that is signed by the family – the child can acquire knowledge, catch jokes, appreciate nuances of language necessary to socialize, relax and tell their own story. The family must put in the time to match the newest member’s language needs so the responsibility for communication is not placed on a zero to 5 year old. Grownups and other family members MUST be willing to adapt to the deaf child’s communication needs. It is not up to a 1 month old child to provide language feedback to a parent – but it is up to the parent to provide language to the child.
Won’t signing adversely affect my child’s academic achievements? After all, bilingualism is confusing.
Good signing skills promote early literacy. A child needs a solid foundation in a first language to understand what literacy is all about and SIGN LANGUAGE is the BEST way to give a deaf child that foundation.
Bilingualism has the advantage in that the bilingual brain is quick, focused and flexible. Frequent juggling between languages increases cognitive benefit. Bilinguals also show an increase in language distinctions which is an advantage in language processing. Bilingualism has been shown to retard the onset of dementia. AND being raised bilingual improved language functioning and high level cognitive skills in children with language impairments. Which is why I always recommend learning sign language for any and all speech and language delays!
Can’t we wait to see if our child succeeds with a CI before working on learning to sign?
The earlier children are exposed to language the greater the guarantee of fluency. Early intervention services delivered BEFORE 6 months of age result in better receptive and expressive language. If parents wait for a CI – many months of language acquisition is lost – even if the child is only 6 months old when implanted – not likely at this time- resulting in the first 6 months of life – the child is not exposed to any language.
But won’t I lose my child to deaf culture?
Parents who sign do not lose their child – it actually increases their bond with that child and brings the parent into the child’s experience. A deaf child will always have a different culture than a hearing parent – but with sign language – the basic tools of communicating and expression are not lost between the parent and the child.
My conclusion:
If you have a child – you should learn to sign regardless of their ability to hear or speak or see or their mobility or their physical appearance – because signing increases cognitive function is ALL children and adults. If we as a society value higher functioning people in our society – then we should all be signing just because it makes our brains better and more flexible.
The team that wrote this article are: Tom Humhries, PhD., Poorna Kushalnagar, PhD., Guarav Mathur, PhD., Donna Jo Napoli, PhD., Carol Padden, PhD., Christian Rathman, PhD. And Scott Smith, PhD., MPH.
All credit goes to them for creating this article.
Please leave comments or questions below! Tell me your story about sign language!